Unbinilium

src: i.vimeocdn.com

Unbinilium, also known as eka-radium or simply element 120, is the hypothetical chemical element in the periodic table with symbol Ubn and atomic number 120. Unbinilium and Ubn are the temporary systematic IUPAC name and symbol, until a permanent name is decided upon. In the periodic table of the elements, it is expected to be an s-block element, an alkaline earth metal, and the second element in the eighth period. It has attracted attention because of some predictions that it may be in the island of stability, although newer calculations expect the island to actually occur at a slightly lower atomic number, closer to copernicium and flerovium.

Unbinilium has not yet been synthesized, despite multiple attempts from German and Russian teams. One 2011 attempt from the German team at the GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research had a suggestive but not conclusive result suggesting the possible production of ²⁹⁹Ubn, but there were several inconsistencies with the theoretically expected decay energies and half-lives of ²⁹⁹Ubn and its daughters and the implanting compound nucleus and evaporation residue could not be identified with certainty. Planned attempts from Russian, Japanese, and French teams are scheduled for 2017-2020. Experimental evidence from these attempts show that the period 8 elements will likely be far more difficult to synthesise than the previous known elements, and that unbinilium may even be the last element that can be synthesized with current technology. Its position as the seventh alkaline earth metal suggests that it would have similar properties to its lighter congeners, beryllium, magnesium, calcium, strontium, barium, and radium; however, relativistic effects may cause some of its properties to differ from those expected from a straight application of periodic trends. For example, unbinilium is expected to be less reactive than barium and radium and be closer in behavior to strontium, and while it should show the characteristic +2 oxidation state of the alkaline earth metals, it is also predicted to show the +4 oxidation state unknown in any other alkaline earth metal.

Video Unbinilium

History

Transactinide elements, such as unbinilium, are produced by nuclear fusion. These fusion reactions can be divided into "hot" and "cold" fusion, depending on the excitation energy of the compound nucleus produced. In hot fusion reactions, very light, high-energy projectiles are accelerated toward very heavy targets (actinides), giving rise to compound nuclei at high excitation energy (~40-50 MeV) that may fission, or alternatively evaporate several (3 to 5) neutrons. In cold fusion reactions (which use heavier projectiles, typically from the fourth period, and lighter targets, usually lead and bismuth), the fused nuclei produced have a relatively low excitation energy (~10-20 MeV), which decreases the probability that these products will undergo fission reactions. As the fused nuclei cool to the ground state, they require emission of only one or two neutrons. However, hot fusion reactions tend to produce more neutron-rich products because the actinides have the highest neutron-to-proton ratios of any elements that can presently be made in macroscopic quantities, and is currently the only method to produce the superheavy elements from flerovium (element 114) onwards.

Ununennium and unbinilium (elements 119 and 120) are the lightest elements that have not yet been synthesized: all the preceding elements have been synthesized, culminating in oganesson (element 118), the heaviest-known element, which completes the seventh row of the periodic table. Attempts to synthesize elements 119 and 120 push the limits of current technology, due to the decreasing cross sections of the production reactions and their probably short half-lives, expected to be on the order of microseconds. Heavier elements would likely be too short-lived to be detected with current technology: they would decay within a microsecond, before reaching the detectors.

Previously, important help (characterized as "silver bullets") in the synthesis of superheavy elements came from the deformed nuclear shells around hassium-270 which increased the stability of surrounding nuclei, and the existence of the quasi-stable neutron-rich isotope calcium-48 which could be used as a projectile to produce more neutron-rich isotopes of superheavy elements. (The more neutron-rich a superheavy nuclide is, the closer it is expected to be to the sought-after island of stability.) Even so, the synthesized isotopes still have fewer neutrons than those expected to be in the island of stability. Furthermore, using calcium-48 to synthesize unbinilium would require a target of fermium-257, which cannot yet be produced in large enough quantities (only picograms can presently be produced; in comparison, milligrams of berkelium and californium are available), and would any case have a lower yield than using an einsteinium target with calcium-48 projectiles to produce ununennium. More practical production of further superheavy elements would require projectiles heavier than ⁴⁸Ca, but this has the drawback of resulting in more symmetrical fusion reactions that are colder and less likely to succeed.

Synthesis attempts

Past

Following their success in obtaining oganesson by the reaction between ²⁴⁹Cf and ⁴⁸Ca in 2006, the team at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) in Dubna started similar experiments in hope of creating unbinilium from nuclei of ⁵⁸Fe and ²⁴⁴Pu. Isotopes of unbinilium are predicted to have alpha decay half-lives of the order of microseconds. In March-April 2007, the synthesis of unbinilium was attempted at the JINR by bombarding a plutonium-244 target with iron-58 ions. Initial analysis revealed that no atoms of element 120 were produced providing a limit of 400 fb for the cross section at the energy studied.

²⁴⁴
₉₄Pu
+ ⁵⁸
₂₆Fe
-> ³⁰²
₁₂₀Ubn
* -> no atoms

The Russian team planned to upgrade their facilities before attempting the reaction again.

In April 2007, the team at the GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research in Darmstadt, Germany attempted to create unbinilium using uranium-238 and nickel-64:

²³⁸
₉₂U
+ ⁶⁴
₂₈Ni
-> ³⁰²
₁₂₀Ubn
* -> no atoms

No atoms were detected providing a limit of 1.6 pb on the cross section at the energy provided. The GSI repeated the experiment with higher sensitivity in three separate runs from April-May 2007, January-March 2008, and September-October 2008, all with negative results and providing a cross section limit of 90 fb.

In August-October 2011, a different team at the GSI using the TASCA facility tried a new, even more asymmetrical reaction:

²⁴⁹
₉₈Cf
+ ⁵⁰
₂₂Ti
-> ²⁹⁹
₁₂₀Ubn
* -> no atoms

Because of its asymmetry, the reaction between ²⁴⁹Cf and ⁵⁰Ti was predicted to be the most favorable practical reaction for synthesizing unbinilium, although it is also somewhat cold, and is further away from the neutron shell closure at N = 184 than any of the other three reactions attempted. No unbinilium atoms were identified, implying a limiting cross-section of 200 fb. Jens Volker Kratz predicted the actual maximum cross-section for producing unbinilium by any of the four reactions ²³⁸U+⁶⁴Ni, ²⁴⁴Pu+⁵⁸Fe, ²⁴⁸Cm+⁵⁴Cr, or ²⁴⁹Cf+⁵⁰Ti to be around 0.1 fb; in comparison, the world record for the smallest cross section of a successful reaction was 30 fb for the reaction ²⁰⁹Bi(⁷⁰Zn,n)²⁷⁸Nh, and Kratz predicted a maximum cross-section of 20 fb for producing the neighbouring ununennium. If these predictions are accurate, then synthesizing ununennium would be at the limits of current technology, and synthesizing unbinilium would require new methods.

Possible observation

In 2011, after upgrading their equipment to allow the use of more radioactive targets, scientists at the GSI attempted the rather asymmetrical fusion reaction:

²⁴⁸
₉₆Cm
+ ⁵⁴
₂₄Cr
-> ³⁰²
₁₂₀Ubn
* -> no atoms

It was expected that the change in reaction would quintuple the probability of synthesizing unbinilium, as the yield of such reactions is strongly dependent on their asymmetry. Although this reaction is less asymmetric than the ²⁴⁹Cf+⁵⁰Ti reaction, it also creates more neutron-rich unbinilium isotopes that should receive increased stability for lying nearer the shell closure at N = 184.

Three correlated signals were observed on 18 May 2011 that matched the predicted alpha decay energies of ²⁹⁹Ubn and its daughter ²⁹⁵Og, as well as the experimentally known decay energy of its granddaughter ²⁹¹Lv: the decay chain could thus be interpreted as beginning from ²⁹⁹Ubn and undergoing four successive alpha decays to the spontaneously fissioning ²⁸³Cn, with the final alpha from ²⁸⁷Fl having been missed. The observed lifetimes for ²⁸⁷Fl and ²⁸³Cn were rather longer than those measured and accepted for those isotopes and ²⁷⁹Ds, but agree well with those measured at Dubna in an early 1999 experiment aimed at synthesising ²⁸⁷Fl; both these chains may originate from isomeric states, or the electron capture of ²⁸⁷Fl leading to ²⁸⁷Nh and its spontaneously fissioning daughter ²⁸³Rg. However, the results could not be confirmed due to lack of beam time, even though the probability that the observations were due to accidental coincidence were calculated as 4 × 10^-8.

Planned

The team at the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna, Russia, is planning to begin new experiments on the synthesis of ununennium and unbinilium using the ²⁴⁹Bk+⁵⁰Ti and ²⁴⁹Cf+⁵⁰Ti reactions in 2019 and 2020 using a new experimental complex. The team at RIKEN in Japan also plans to make attempts on these elements in 2017 through 2020 with ²⁴⁸Cm targets using the ²⁴⁸Cm+⁵¹V and ²⁴⁸Cm+⁵⁴Cr reactions: following this, RIKEN plans to attempt the synthesis of unbiunium (element 121). The RIKEN team also intends to study the differences that arise from changing from ⁴⁸Ca to heavier projectiles by the ²⁴⁸Cm+⁵⁰Ti reaction aimed at producing new isotopes of oganesson. The team at GANIL in France also plans to search for heavy isotopes of existing superheavy elements and the new element unbinilium in 2019 and 2020 using ²⁴⁴Pu and ²⁴⁸Cm targets. Also in 2020, the JINR plans to use a mixed-isotope ^249-251Cf target and a ⁵⁰Ti beam to aim for the isotope ²⁹⁸Ubn.

Radioactive rubidium beams can be produced since 2015 at CERN's HIE-ISOLDE apparatus with sufficient intensity to consider the production of element 120 in the reaction of rubidium beams with a bismuth-209 target in a cold fusion reaction. In particular, the use of ⁹⁵Rb would allow the neutron shell at N = 184 to be reached.

The laboratories at RIKEN in Japan and at the JINR in Russia are best suited to these experiments as they are the only ones in the world where long beam times are accessible for reactions with such low predicted cross-sections.

Naming

Using Mendeleev's nomenclature for unnamed and undiscovered elements, unbinilium should be known as eka-radium. Using the 1979 IUPAC recommendations, the element should be temporarily called unbinilium (symbol Ubn) until it is discovered, the discovery is confirmed, and a permanent name chosen. Although unbinilium is widely used in the chemical community on all levels, from chemistry classrooms to advanced textbooks, scientists who work theoretically or experimentally on superheavy elements typically call it "element 120", with the symbol E120, (120) or 120.

Maps Unbinilium

Predicted properties

Nuclear stability and isotopes

The stability of nuclei decreases greatly with the increase in atomic number after curium, element 96, whose half-life is four orders of magnitude longer than that of any currently known higher-numbered element. All isotopes with an atomic number above 101 undergo radioactive decay with half-lives of less than 30 hours. No elements with atomic numbers above 82 (after lead) have stable isotopes. Nevertheless, because of reasons not yet well understood, there is a slight increase of nuclear stability around atomic numbers 110-114, which leads to the appearance of what is known in nuclear physics as the "island of stability". This concept, proposed by University of California professor Glenn Seaborg, explains why superheavy elements last longer than predicted.

In a quantum tunneling model with mass estimates from a macroscopic-microscopic model, the alpha-decay half-lives of several unbinilium isotopes (^292-304Ubn) have been predicted to be around 1-20 microseconds. Some heavier isotopes may be more stable; Fricke and Waber predicted ³²⁰Ubn to be the most stable unbinilium isotope in 1971. Since unbinilium is expected to decay via a cascade of alpha decays leading to spontaneous fission around copernicium, the total half-lives of unbinilium isotopes are also predicted to be measured in microseconds. This has consequences for the synthesis of unbinilium, as isotopes with half-lives below one microsecond would decay before reaching the detector. Nevertheless, new theoretical models show that the expected gap in energy between the proton orbitals 2f_7/2 (filled at element 114) and 2f_5/2 (filled at element 120) is smaller than expected, so that element 114 no longer appears to be a stable spherical closed nuclear shell, and this energy gap may increase the stability of elements 119 and 120. The next doubly magic nucleus is now expected to be around the spherical ³⁰⁶Ubb (element 122), but the expected low half-life and low production cross section of this nuclide makes its synthesis challenging.

Given that element 120 fills the 2f_5/2 proton orbital, much attention has been given to the compound nucleus ³⁰²Ubn* and its properties. Several experiments have been performed between 2000 and 2008 at the Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions in Dubna studying the fission characteristics of the compound nucleus ³⁰²Ubn*. Two nuclear reactions have been used, namely ²⁴⁴Pu+⁵⁸Fe and ²³⁸U+⁶⁴Ni. The results have revealed how nuclei such as this fission predominantly by expelling closed shell nuclei such as ¹³²Sn (Z=50, N=82). It was also found that the yield for the fusion-fission pathway was similar between ⁴⁸Ca and ⁵⁸Fe projectiles, indicating a possible future use of ⁵⁸Fe projectiles in superheavy element formation.

In 2008, the team at GANIL, France, described the results from a new technique which attempts to measure the fission half-life of a compound nucleus at high excitation energy, since the yields are significantly higher than from neutron evaporation channels. It is also a useful method for probing the effects of shell closures on the survivability of compound nuclei in the super-heavy region, which can indicate the exact position of the next proton shell (Z=114, 120, 124, or 126). The team studied the nuclear fusion reaction between uranium ions and a target of natural nickel:

²³⁸
₉₂U
+ ^nat
₂₈Ni
-> ^{296,298,299,300,302}
₁₂₀Ubn
* -> fission

The results indicated that nuclei of unbinilium were produced at high (~70 MeV) excitation energy which underwent fission with measurable half-lives just over 10^-18 s. Although very short (indeed, insufficient for the element to be considered by IUPAC to exist, because a compound nucleus has no internal structure and its nucleons have not been arranged into shells until it has survived for 10^-14 s, upon which it forms an electronic cloud), the ability to measure such a process indicates a strong shell effect at Z=120. At lower excitation energy (see neutron evaporation), the effect of the shell will be enhanced and ground-state nuclei can be expected to have relatively long half-lives. This result could partially explain the relatively long half-life of ²⁹⁴Og measured in experiments at Dubna. Similar experiments have indicated a similar phenomenon at element 124 but not for flerovium, suggesting that the next proton shell does in fact lie beyond element 120. In September 2007, the team at RIKEN began a program utilizing ²⁴⁸Cm targets and have indicated future experiments to probe the possibility of 120 being the next proton magic number (and 184 being the next neutron magic number) using the aforementioned nuclear reactions to form ³⁰²Ubn*, as well as ²⁴⁸Cm+⁵⁴Cr. They also planned to further chart the region by investigating the nearby compound nuclei ²⁹⁶Og*, ²⁹⁸Og*, ³⁰⁶Ubb*, and ³⁰⁸Ubb*.

Atomic and physical

Being the second period 8 element, unbinilium is predicted to be an alkaline earth metal, below beryllium, magnesium, calcium, strontium, barium, and radium. Each of these elements has two valence electrons in the outermost s-orbital (valence electron configuration ns²), which is easily lost in chemical reactions to form the +2 oxidation state: thus the alkaline earth metals are rather reactive elements, with the exception of beryllium due to its small size. Unbinilium is predicted to continue the trend and have a valence electron configuration of 8s². It is therefore expected to behave much like its lighter congeners; however, it is also predicted to differ from the lighter alkaline earth metals in some properties.

The main reason for the predicted differences between unbinilium and the other alkaline earth metals is the spin-orbit (SO) interaction--the mutual interaction between the electrons' motion and spin. The SO interaction is especially strong for the superheavy elements because their electrons move faster--at velocities comparable to the speed of light--than those in lighter atoms. In unbinilium atoms, it lowers the 7p and 8s electron energy levels, stabilizing the corresponding electrons, but two of the 7p electron energy levels are more stabilized than the other four. The effect is called subshell splitting, as it splits the 7p subshell into more-stabilized and the less-stabilized parts. Computational chemists understand the split as a change of the second (azimuthal) quantum number l from 1 to 1/2 and 3/2 for the more-stabilized and less-stabilized parts of the 7p subshell, respectively. Thus, the outer 8s electrons of unbinilium are stabilized and become harder to remove than expected, while the 7p_3/2 electrons are correspondingly destabilized, perhaps allowing them to participate in chemical reactions. This stabilization of the outermost s-orbital (already significant in radium) is the key factor affecting unbinilium's chemistry, and causes all the trends for atomic and molecular properties of alkaline earth metals to reverse direction after barium.

Due to the stabilization of its outer 8s electrons, unbinilium's first ionization energy--the energy required to remove an electron from a neutral atom--is predicted to be 6.0 eV, comparable to that of calcium. The electron of the hydrogen-like unbinilium atom--oxidized so it has only one electron, Ubn¹¹⁹⁺--is predicted to move so quickly that its mass is 2.05 times that of a non-moving electron, a feature coming from the relativistic effects. For comparison, the figure for hydrogen-like radium is 1.30 and the figure for hydrogen-like barium is 1.095. According to simple extrapolations of relativity laws, that indirectly indicates the contraction of the atomic radius to around 200 pm, very close to that of strontium (215 pm); the ionic radius of the Ubn²⁺ ion is also correspondingly lowered to 160 pm. The trend in electron affinity is also expected to reverse direction similarly at radium and unbinilium.

Unbinilium should be a solid at room temperature, with melting point 680 °C: this continues the downward trend down the group, being lower than the value 700 °C for radium. The boiling point of unbinilium is expected to be around 1700 °C, which is lower than that of all the previous elements in the group (in particular, radium boils at 1737 °C), following the downward periodic trend. The density of unbinilium has been predicted to be 7 g·cm^-3, continuing the trend of increasing density down the group: the value for radium is 5.5 g·cm^-3.

Chemical

The chemistry of unbinilium is predicted to be similar to that of the alkaline earth metals, but it would probably behave more like calcium or strontium than barium or radium. Like strontium, unbinilium should react vigorously with air to form an oxide (UbnO) and with water to form the hydroxide (Ubn(OH)₂), which would be a strong base, and releasing hydrogen gas. It should also react with the halogens to form salts such as UbnCl₂. While these reactions would be expected from periodic trends, their lowered intensity is somewhat unusual, as ignoring relativistic effects, periodic trends would predict unbinilium to be even more reactive than barium or radium. This lowered reactivity is due to the relativistic stabilization of unbinilium's valence electron, increasing unbinilium's first ionization energy and decreasing the metallic and ionic radii; this effect is already seen for radium. the chemistry of unbinilium in the +2 oxidation state should be more similar to the chemistry of strontium than to that of radium. On the other hand, the ionic radius of the Ubn²⁺ ion is predicted to be larger than that of Sr²⁺, because the 7p orbitals are destabilized and are thus larger than the p-orbitals of the lower shells. Unbinilium may also show the +4 oxidation state, which is not seen in any other alkaline earth metal, in addition to the +2 oxidation state that is characteristic of the other alkaline earth metals and is also the main oxidation state of all the known alkaline earth metals: this is because of the destabilization and expansion of the 7p_3/2 spinor, causing its outermost electrons to have a lower ionization energy than what would otherwise be expected. The +1 state may also be stable in isolation. Many unbinilium compounds are expected to have a large covalent character, due to the involvement of the 7p_3/2 electrons in the bonding: this effect is also seen to a lesser extent in radium, which shows some 6s and 6p_3/2 contribution to the bonding in radium fluoride (RaF₂) and astatide (RaAt₂), resulting in these compounds having more covalent character. The standard reduction potential of the Ubn²⁺/Ubn couple is predicted to be -2.9 V.

In the gas phase, the alkaline earth metals do not usually form covalently bonded diatomic molecules like the alkali metals do, since such molecules would have the same number of electrons in the bonding and antibonding orbitals and would have very low dissociation energies. Thus, the M-M bonding in these molecules is predominantly through van der Waals forces. The metal-metal bond lengths in these M₂ molecules increase down the group from Ca₂ to Ubn₂. On the other hand, their metal-metal bond-dissociation energies generally increase from Ca₂ to Ba₂ and then drop precipitously to Ubn₂, which should be the most weakly bound of all the group 2 homodiatomic molecules. The cause of this trend is the increasing participation of the p_3/2 and d electrons as well as the relativistically contracted s orbital. From these M₂ dissociation energies, the enthalpy of sublimation (?H_sub) of unbinilium is predicted to be 150 kJ·mol^-1.

The Ubn-Au bond should be the weakest of all bonds between gold and an alkaline earth metal, but should still be stable. This gives extrapolated medium-sized adsorption enthalpies (-?H_ads) of 172 kJ·mol^-1 on gold (the radium value should be 237 kJ·mol^-1) and 50 kJ·mol^-1 on silver, the smallest of all the alkaline earth metals, that demonstrate that it would be feasible to study the chromatographic adsorption of unbinilium onto surfaces made of noble metals. The ?H_sub and -?H_ads values are correlated for the alkaline earth metals.

src: static.straitstimes.com.sg

See also

• Island of stability: flerovium-unbinilium-unbihexium

src: i.ytimg.com

Notes

src: filmshortage.com

References

Source of the article : Wikipedia